terça-feira, março 06, 2007

EEUU anuncia la muerte de diez soldados en Irak en menos de 24 horas



El ejército estadounidense informó hoy de que diez soldados de ese país murieron ayer y cinco resultaron heridos en tres sucesos en las provincias de Salahadin y Diyala, al norte de Bagdad.
La nota, que no da más detalles sobre lo sucedido, agrega que los uniformados eran parte de las fuerzas estadounidenses destinadas en la provincia de Salahadin, coconsiderada uno de los feudos de la insurgencia suní.
La identidad de estos soldados, que eleva hasta los 3.179 los muertos en Irak desde que comenzó la guerra, no ha sido desvelada, ya que en estos momentos el ejército estadounidense está notificando a sus familias su fallecimientonsiderada uno de los feudos de la insurgencia suní. (20 minutos)

23 Comments:

Anonymous Anônimo said...

soma e segue.

6:37 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

A Europa ???? Qual Europa ????? O que é isso ?

A Europa é uma Repartição Pública que manda os outros fazer PRICES e SIMPLEXS.....e nós parvos...fazemos !!!!!e os Américas vendem......

1:21 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Naturalmete que o número de baixas americanas é muto superior, basta saber que o número de feridos ultrapassa os 40 mil. Na verdade os numeros que se aproxinan mais da realidade romdam os 9 mil.

A mim espanta-me com aqueles bravos da resistência Iraquiana travarm a marcha imperialista dos USA para o domínio do Mundo.O Mundo fica-lhes a dever isso.

7:08 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

E já agora, vejamos o carácter, se dúvidas houvessem, dos juízes, se de juízes os podemos chamar, dos que condenaram Sadam ao linchamento:



Coward Abdel-Rahman at trial of Saddam Hussein


March 11, 2007

The headlines on Al-Jazeera’s website on March 9, 2007 were unexpected and powerful: "Saddam Judge Flees Iraq." Raouf Abdel-Rhaman, the judge who sentenced Saddam Hussein, as well as Barzan al-Tikriti and Awad al-Bandar, to death, has left Iraq and has applied for political asylum in Great Britain. Before I get to the absurdity of this cowardly act, let’s look at the trial over which Abdel-Rahman presided.

The first trial of Saddam was for signing death warrants of 148 people in Dujail.. They had a three-year comprehensive trial and were found guilty of treason and attempted assassination. At the time, the Iran-Iraq War was raging and those who tried to kill Saddam were Iraqis fighting on the side of Iran. Many fled Iraq and stayed in Iran until the aftermath of the illegal March 2003 invasion of Iraq by the U.S.

The trial began with a judge, Rizgar Amin, who appeared to be fair. He gave both sides chances to plead their cases. However, within a few weeks, he resigned. He was disgusted and asserted that the stooge Iraqi government had given him orders how to run the trial and told him he was allowing Saddam too much leeway. He decided not to take orders from the quislings and run a scripted trial.

His successor, Abdel-Rahman made it clear from day number one that he would be the person to orchestrate a show trial in which the verdict was a foregone conclusion. He kicked the defendants out of court. He kicked their lawyers out of court. Sometimes, he held court proceedings with neither the defendants nor their lawyers in the court room.

Something happened that could have upset his and the stooges’ plans, even though the outcome was not in doubt. On May 30, 2006, a witness appeared who could have blown the whistle on the entire prosecution case. But, a quick-witted Abdel-Rahman went into action.

In December 2005, Ali al-Haidari appeared in court for the prosecution. He said there was no assassination attempt in 1982 against Saddam.

On May 30, 2006, a defense witness said he had proof that al-Haidari was lying. In addition, he accused the head prosecutor, Jaafar al-Musawi of traveling to Dujail and trying to bribe people to come forward to testify against Saddam. Al-Musawi quickly protested the accusation and said he had never been to Dujail in his life.

Al-Rahman chastised the witness and asked what proof he had. He then produced a videotape that showed al-Haidari giving a speech in which he praised the "heroes" who tried to assassinate Saddam. Don’t forget, al-Haidari had said, under oath, that there had been no assassination attempt.

To make matters worse, the tape then showed al-Musawi (who said he had never been in Dujail) attending the celebration in which al-Haidari spoke in 2004.

Al-Rahman was not about to let the truth get in the way of a kangaroo court. He said that the person in the videotape was not prosecutor al-Musawi, but someone who just happened to look exactly like him and who had the same voice.

The tape was confiscated by the court. Then, the witness, along with three other defense witnesses, one who stated the names and addresses of 23 of those listed as put to death by the Iraqi government in 1985, who were still alive, were arrested.

The only news reported after their arrest was that one witness escaped and went to Jordan, where he spoke to the press and said he and his comrades were violently tortured. Neither he nor anyone else has spoken of the fate of the other three witnesses. Despite attempts at finding out the circumstances of the witnesses, the court refused to comment when asked by the press.

Al-Rahman was easily infuriated. Barzan al-Tikriti, who has since been hanged, would mention the judge’s Kurdish background. When he complained to al-Tikriti about mentioning his ethnicity, the former Iraqi Intelligence minister said, "I have no complex against the Kurds, some of my best friends are Kurds." Abdel-Rahman exploded and shouted, "Stop referring to me as a Kurd," and he ordered al-Tikriti out of the courtroom.

Bushra al-Khalil, Saddam’s female Lebanese lawyer once was physically dragged out of the court room by four thugs. What was her crime? She asked the judge if she could make a statement.

Abdel-Rahman only allowed a few defense witnesses, while the prosecution presented as many as they desired. The prosecution took days in its summation of the case. When the defense began, Abdel-Rahman halted the closing remarks and said that if they had not proved their case by now, there was no merit in allowing them closing statements.

When the appeals court turned down the request of Saddam’s defense team about the death verdict, Abdel-Rhaman had to set an execution date within 30 days of the appeal verdict. Saddam was hanged within four days, on the date of the beginning of a Moslem holiday.

Abdel-Rhaman relished his image as a no-nonsense, tough judge. His actions made up for the years of Ba’athist rule in Iraq. He wanted to be revered in the same manner as a Hollywood star.

The truth differs, however. He stood against everything a judge is supposed to represent: to find the truth. He lied and he was a fraud. He was brave while he was protected by the U.S. Army in the Green Zone and while he was in court with numerous bodyguards and his opponents were in chains.

Once the hangings were conducted, it appears that Abdel-Rahman must have lost some of his protection. He fled to Great Britain.

Saddam Hussein had numerous offers to "cleanse" himself. While incarcerated, if he made a public appearance on Iraqi television and asked the resistance to cease its attacks, he would now be living on some island in the Pacific, replete with a mansion and more money than he could ever use. He refused.

Abdel-Rahman, who was perceived to be the tough man who ordered Saddam’s death, is just the opposite. He is a coward.

There is one aspect to this whole unlikely scenario that confuses me, but I have yet to read where anyone else has picked up on the quandary. Abdel-Rahman is asking for "political asylum" in Great Britain. Political asylum is usually requested by citizens of countries in which they are not allowed political, social or religious rights that other citizens enjoy. Abdel-Rahman is a product of the quisling Iraqi government. He was right in the middle of all the shenanigans and violence the stooges have thrust on Iraq. Why is he asking for "political asylum" when he was a mainstream player in current Iraqi politics?

We all know the real reason for his craven exit from Iraq. There are many Iraqis who were offended by Saddam Hussein’s show trial and hanging and some were probably picking up the stench of Abdel-Rahman’s scent. Even the U.S. and the Iraqi quislings would have been unable to give him enough security to ensure he would still be alive at retirement age.





:: Article nr. 31271 sent on 11-mar-2007 04:53 ECT


www.uruknet.info?p=31271

4:13 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

I am really enjoying the theme/design of your site. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems?

A few of my blog readers have complained about my blog
not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera.
Do you have any suggestions to help fix this issue?

My site: ur-social.com
My page ... premier weeknight

10:21 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Heya terrific blog! Does running a blog like this require a large
amount of work? I have very little understanding of programming but I was hoping to start
my own blog soon. Anyhow, should you have any recommendations or techniques for new blog owners please share.

I know this is off subject nevertheless I simply needed to ask.
Many thanks!

Here is my blog post; driveways

1:49 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Hi. I was thinking of adding a website link back to your
website since both of our sites are based mostly around the same topic.
Would you prefer I link to you using your site address:
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21963219&postID=689553643868869513
or website title: Blogger: classepolitica. Be sure to let me know at your earliest
convenience. Cheers

Feel free to visit my blog bicycle racing

12:23 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Hey admin, I just wanted to give you a quick heads up that your current Link:
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21963219&postID=689553643868869513
is being flagged as a potentially harmful web page in my browser internet
explorer. I'd highly recommend having somebody look into it. You could very well lose a lot of website visitors due to this issue. Very best of Luck.

My site - driveway paving

12:35 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Howdy! This is my first comment here so I just
wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I truly enjoy reading through your articles.
Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal
with the same subjects? Many thanks!

Feel free to visit my website; bicycle
my page: online backup

2:24 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I
provide credit and sources back to your site?
My blog is in the very same niche as yours and my visitors would certainly benefit from a lot of the information you provide here.

Please let me know if this alright with you. Appreciate it!



My web page: weeknight

6:43 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though
you relied on the video to make your point. You clearly know what youre talking about,
why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving
us something informative to read?

Here is my weblog ... wedged

6:50 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Good day! I was interested to know if setting up a site such your own:
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21963219&postID=689553643868869513 is challenging to do for
inexperienced people? I've been wanting to develop my own blog for a while now but have been turned off mainly because I've always assumed it
required tons of work. What do you think? Thanks alot :)

my webpage - sneaker
Also see my web site: psychopath

2:37 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Superb blog! Do you have any recommendations for aspiring writers?
I'm hoping to start my own blog soon but I'm a little lost on everything.

Would you suggest starting with a free platform like Wordpress or go for a paid
option? There are so many options out there that I'm totally confused .. Any recommendations? Thank you!

my web blog Stump Rotting

8:01 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

I am new to building sites and I was wondering if
having your blog title related to your content really that critical?
I see your title, "Blogger: classepolitica "
does appear to be spot on with what your blog is about but yet,
I prefer to keep my title less content descriptive and based more around site branding.
Would you think this is a good idea or bad idea? Any kind of assistance would be greatly appreciated.


Review my blog post: www.sarahsmiley.Com

8:14 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Greetings I am so glad I found your blog page,
I really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Aol for something
else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say thanks a
lot for a remarkable post and a all round thrilling blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t
have time to look over it all at the minute but I have book-marked it
and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be
back to read much more, Please do keep up the superb jo.


my homepage ... trake

11:29 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Howdy! My name is Maisie and I really just desired to say
your blog website is great! It truly is hilarious because I use to have a site that
practically had an identical url: http://www.blogger.
com/comment.g?blogID=21963219&postID=689553643868869513 mine was
only a few characters different. Nonetheless, I am a big supporter of your blog site and if you at any time
want a guest write-up you should email me at: iriscarrillo@t-online.
de. I absolutely love writing!

My page: Packaging

6:26 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Hey! It seems as though we both have a interest for the same thing.
Your blog, "Blogger: classepolitica" and mine are very similar.
Have you ever thought about authoring a guest post for a related blog?

It will surely help gain exposure to your website (my site recieves a lot of targeted
traffic). If you happen to be interested, email me at: boydhaggerty@hotmail.

com. Thanks for your time

my weblog :: road

3:50 PM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Have you ever thought about publishing an e-book or guest
authoring on other blogs? I have a blog based on the same topics you discuss and would love to have you share some
stories/information. I know my subscribers would
enjoy your work. If you're even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.

my homepage: oprema

6:36 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Hi just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know
a few of the pictures aren't loading properly. I'm not sure
why but I think its a linking issue. I've tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same results.

Also visit my webpage folija

11:17 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

I am curious to find out what blog system you're utilizing? I'm having
some small security issues with my latest blog and I would like to find something
more secure. Do you have any recommendations?

Here is my web site - web

12:45 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Hi my family member! I wiѕh to say that
thiѕ ρost is amazing, nіce ωritten and come
with аlmoѕt all vital infos. Ι'd like to peer more posts like this .

My weblog; diamondlinks review

11:33 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Gday. I'm sorry to bother you but I ran across your blog website and noticed you are using the exact same template as me. The only problem is on my blog, I'm battling to get the layout looking like yours.
Would you mind emailing me at: bretthutcherson@gmail.
com so I can get this figured out. By the way I have bookmarked your
site: http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21963219&postID=689553643868869513
and will certainly be visiting frequently. Thankyou!

Take a look at my site :: advokati u zenici

10:25 AM  
Anonymous Anônimo said...

Hello! Someone in my Facebook group shared this website with us so I came to check it out.
I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm bookmarking and will be tweeting this
to my followers! Exceptional blog and terrific
design.

Feel free to visit my blog ... advokatska komora

11:54 AM  

Postar um comentário

<< Home